I have worked for “for-profit’ institutions, I have also
benefitted from the for-profit education (non-traditional education), so it is
safe to say I am not against for-profit education (but I am not a cheerleader).
Yes, there are bad apples in the industry, but that is the same in any
industry, and yes, there needs to be some improvements made; but we are never
supposed to rest on our laurels anyway in education or we start to stagnate.
It continues to sadden me whenever I see national politics
and politicians injecting themselves negatively into this particular
conversation, because I am a firm advocate that all sectors of the education
industry should be truly working together to serve students. By the way, many
schools out there operate on a ‘for-profit’ model, but just happen to be
non-profit. I think we should really be looking at the ‘non-traditional’
education market rather than just for-profit, especially since they serve the same
population.
The amount of energy and taxpayer money that continues to be
wasted, by creating divisions is shameful because, that money could have been
used to building bridges and improving student services and achievement as a
whole.
“Durbin, DeVry Spar on Senator's Letter to High Schools”
“U.S. Sen. Richard Durbin of Illinois sent high school principals
in his state a letter Tuesday urging them to shield their students from
the "often irresistible lure" of for-profit colleges -- drawing a pointed response from one of his constituents, DeVry
Education Group.”
“Durbin, a leader among the Congressional Democrats who are deeply
skeptical of the for-profit higher education sector, told the principals that
he was continuing his work in Washington to "correct federal policies that
enable this industry to take advantage of students." But he asked the
principals to do their part to "ensure that your students are receiving
honest and accurate information about their higher education options.
"Students can hardly ride a CTA bus, watch their favorite prime-time
sitcom, or surf the internet without being bombarded by attention-grabbing
advertisements from for-profit colleges offering a hassle-free enrollment
process, federal financial assistance, flexible schedules and a promised path
to high-paying jobs and a better life," Durbin wrote. "But too often
it doesn't work out that way."”
“His letter cites statistics about the completion rates and debt
loads of the colleges' students and suggests that principals remind their
students that community colleges offer similar programs "at a fraction of
the cost."”
“In its response, DeVry, which is based near Durbin's Chicago
home, noted that DeVry has educated tens of thousands of Illinoisans since 1931
and that the company teams with the Chicago Public Schools on an Advantage
Academy that lets students earn associate degree credits while in high school.
The program, it notes, was started in tandem with the then-head of the city's
schools, Education Secretary Arne Duncan, a close ally of Durbin's.
"The facts, and our history, demonstrate our commitment to
Illinois students and their success in higher education," wrote Sharon Thomas
Parrott, DeVry's senior vice president for external relations and global
responsibility. "We encourage the senator to visit our Chicago campus, and
our Advantage Academy, so that he can learn firsthand how we serve our
students."”
Read it here: http://www.insidehighered.com/quicktakes/2014/04/30/durbin-devry-spar-senators-letter-high-schools#sthash.y69tgkab.dpbs
I know this article will annoy some folks, but I like to think I
am looking at this objectively.
Senator Durbin: what are you actually contributing towards helping
students? This is not a political question (especially since I never vote along
party lines), but a simple education question. Are you helping to solve or
helping to divide? Are you consulting educators or political staffers? What is
your end goal?
Remember, in the end,
it is all about the students…
Dr Flavius A B Akerele III
Dr Flavius A B Akerele III
The ETeam