When Did Logical Fallacies Become Debate Strategies?
Winning an Argument Isn't the Same as Making One. In my previous article, Whatever Happened to the Art of Disagreement? , I suggested that we've become less capable of having thoughtful conversations with people who see the world differently. That led me to another question: when did logical fallacies become acceptable debate strategies? When I was a student, logical fallacies were something we were taught to avoid. If you relied on one in a paper or debate, your instructor pointed it out because it weakened your argument. Today, many of those same fallacies are celebrated. Delivered with enough confidence, they can sound persuasive, even when they rely on faulty reasoning instead of evidence. To be fair, every one of us, including me, is susceptible to logical fallacies. The goal isn't to become better at winning arguments. It's to become better thinkers. Here are a few examples we encounter every day: Ad Hominem Instead...