Confident, Arrogant, or Just Really Good at Their Job?
Navigating High Achievers in the Workplace
When I was younger, I was sometimes accused of being
arrogant at work. Maybe occasionally I was. Age and experience have taught me
enough humility to acknowledge that possibility. But I also know that sometimes
what was perceived as arrogance was simply confidence. I was educated,
prepared, good at what I did, and comfortable expressing what I knew.
That distinction matters.
Because managers routinely encounter employees who are
highly capable, highly confident, or both. And if we mistake confidence for
arrogance, or arrogance for competence, we can make poor leadership decisions
in either direction.
So how do we tell the difference?
Arrogance, Confidence, and Competence
They can look remarkably similar from a distance.
A confident employee trusts their abilities. They can
usually explain what they know without needing everyone else to know less. They
can accept correction; they acknowledge limitations and learn from someone else
without feeling diminished.
An arrogant employee may also be talented, but the
difference often appears in how they interact with others. Do they dismiss
colleagues? Do they need to establish superiority? Can they admit when they're
wrong? Can they receive feedback without treating it as a threat?
Then there is something we sometimes overlook:
Training and competence.
Some people aren't trying to be confident at all. They're
simply trained.
They have spent years studying their field, practicing their
craft, encountering problems, making mistakes, and recognizing patterns. What
looks effortless to someone else may represent thousands of hours of
preparation.
Ask an experienced professional a question and they may
answer immediately. That isn't necessarily arrogance. They may simply know
the answer. And that's where perception becomes dangerous.
Perception Isn't Always Reality
We tell employees that perception matters. It does. But
managers also have a responsibility to ask whether their perceptions are accurate.
Is this employee actually arrogant? Or are they direct?
Are they dismissive of others? Or do they simply process
information quickly?
Are they unwilling to learn? Or are we uncomfortable because
they already know something we expected to teach them?
And perhaps most importantly:
Would we interpret the exact same behavior differently if
it came from someone else?
Leadership requires enough self-awareness to ask those
questions.
So How Do You Manage the High Achiever?
First, don't punish competence.
High achievers need challenges. Giving your strongest
employee more of the same work because they're good at it isn't development.
Eventually, it's just more work.
Second, give them honest feedback.
Confidence doesn't mean someone has nothing left to learn.
In fact, one of the best tests separating confidence from arrogance may be what
happens when you say:
“You're very good at this, but here's an area where I
think you can be better.”
Watch the response.
Third, give them room to operate.
Someone who has demonstrated competence may not need the
same level of supervision as someone still learning the job. Equitable
management doesn't mean identical management.
And finally, create somewhere for them to go.
If a talented employee sees no opportunity to grow,
contribute at a higher level, mentor others, tackle more complex problems, or
advance within the organization, don't be surprised when another organization
gives them one.
Maybe We Don't Manage People
I've increasingly wondered whether the phrase managing
people is even accurate.
People aren't processes. They have different personalities,
experiences, motivations, communication styles, learning preferences,
strengths, and ambitions.
Perhaps our job isn't to manage people. Maybe our job is
to create conditions in which different people can perform at their best, and
that includes the struggling employee.
It includes the developing employee. And yes, it includes
the highly confident, highly trained employee who occasionally makes the
manager uncomfortable.
Because leadership isn't demonstrated by how well we manage
people who are easy to manage. Sometimes it is demonstrated by whether we can
recognize talent, understand it, challenge it, and keep it.
Leadership Reflection: how do you distinguish between
arrogance and genuine confidence or competence, and how does your organization
bring out the best in its highest achievers?
Dr. Flavius A. B. Akerele III, EdD, MBA
#Leadership #TalentDevelopment #HighPerformers
#EmployeeDevelopment #LeadershipDevelopment #WorkplaceCulture #PeopleLeadership
#LeadershipReflection
Comments
Post a Comment
Please be respectful, thoughtful, and relevant with your comments:))