First of all, I am not against the very rich donating money
for education; they have it we need it. However, the question has arisen about
how they might be pushing their own agenda with that money, or how systems might
become too dependent on that check.
“AFT Says It Will No
Longer Accept Gates Funding”
“The
American Federation of Teachers, to date the recipient of more than $11 million
in Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation largesse, will no longer accept Gates
funding, Politico has reported,
citing increasing criticism from members.”
“AFT
officials said the union's President, Randi Weingarten, made the announcement
at the Network for Public Education conference last week in Austin, Texas. NPE
is an advocacy group begun by Diane Ravitch and other critics of so-called
"corporate education reform."”
“Education Week took a long look at Gates
funding for teacher-quality efforts last year, and at that time
Weingarten hinted that pushback from members might effect a change in its
willingness to accept cash from the Seattle-based philanthropy.”
“Much
of the cash has supported AFT's innovation fund, which supports local
projects. Politico also says that the AFT will seek ways of funding
the initiative through a dues surcharge, which would have to be approved by
members at this year's biennial AFT convention in Los Angeles.”
Read
here: http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/teacherbeat/2014/03/aft_will_not_accept.html?cmp=ENL-EU-NEWS3
Do
you think there could be strings attached to this money or is it true altruism?
Dr
Flavius A B Akerele III
The
ETeam
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please be respectful, thoughtful, and relevant with your comments:))